Eu4 mughals or persia. I've snaked far enough int...
Eu4 mughals or persia. I've snaked far enough into India to form the Mughals but I've just seen I have Started this play through intending to make Mughals cause you couldn’t make Persia as Timurids back in the day, but I guess now you can. i plan to conquer all of india and beat the ottomans. What is the best starting nation to form mughals easily on current patch? I am thinking of Afghanistan. I generally own all of Persia as the Mughals almost a hundred years before you have your problem, so my advice is simple: expand like crazy to the southwest right at the start even Both are really good, but as the Mughals you get a decision for -6% tech cost if any of your provinces are Hindu. Persia As of v1. Still, going Persia instead of Mughals would also be a bit fantasy if you want just In my Luwu campaign I saw both Persia and the Mughals exist at the same time. Persia has An Iranian cultural country can also become a Mughal, but it cannot become a Mughal if it becomes Persia. The Afghan tribes survived, however, and were united, along with groups like Baluchistan and Sind. This was somewhat influenced I am about to change tag from Timurid to Mughal and cannot decide to change traditions and ideas. I have never seen this before and am asking if others have saw it and if they did how rare it is. Also starting out as . Military: Both get: 165 votes, 82 comments. Mughal missions are mainly focused around conquering and vassalising the other Indian states, as well as defeating Persia and England should they begin to pose a threat. Would love to get Long time player but first time playing in a long time. Mughals is a top tier set though, -core cost and big cavalry combat to go with 5% discipline and basically no trouble with religions/unity is a big boost and the -tech cost isn't great at 5% but welcome. If you follow the mission tree after becoming Persia, you will give claims Hello, Here is my question What's the most powerful form nations in the middle east region in EU4? Rum vs Moguls vs Persia? In my opinion I think : 1- Persia 2- Rum 3- Moguls I compare their ideas & There was this trick to attack Tabarestan and release Persia so the event that makes your Persian cores revolt disappears (because one of the conditions is for Persia to not exist). How much admin to re-core states in persia and india would you consider worth to move your capital to europe to gain access to the asian trade companies with Hello friends, I know this has probably been done countless times but I am trying to find a comprehensive list of countries that COULD potentially form Mughals. You just can't go straight from Persia to Mughals. 26, a Central Asian, independent or tributary state to a religious group Muslim, except Persia or the Ottomans, only needs to own one of Lahore, Doaba, Central Doab as a core province, and Delhi, Is not the Mughals, the Timurids, Persia, the Holy Roman Empire, the Roman Empire, the Papal State the Ottomans, Byzantium, or Arabia Primary culture is in the Iranian culture group, or country is Aq I've found people giving different kinds of advice: Mughals should move their main trading port back to Persia and turn India into trade companies, Mughals should i started as timurids and formed the mughals. Played as Timurids thinking I’d just form Mughals, but now I learn I can form Persia. Hey all! Just asking if Mughals are really worth forming if there's the chance, although at high cost. They get claims on Persia, and that's it. Persia's most useful benefit is surely the culture union, the culture which you already own for most of the part. where should i state or plan to state ? its 1550 and i am running out of GC but im building courthouses to The trade switch from Persia to India, it took me more time then it should have to figure out why I suddenly was in massive debt the first time I did a timurids into I've started a playthrough as Ajam and have currently reformed Timurids + own pretty much the entire Persia subcontinent. The state of Persia depicted in-game was formed in the early 16th century by the Safavid dynasty and their Qizilbash (half tribe; half "military quasi-order") supporters, which exist in-game as A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. And my economy took a hit, im bleeding money, and lost a lot of trade power Being muslim is really strong for the Mughals. The Timurids fell to Persia around the early-mid 16th century. The single biggest reason with Mughal ideas would be the 25% core cost reduction. Mughals for sure, you can form it way more quickly than the other 2, has a great mission tree, very good ideas and the best government reforms in eu4 for blobbing Missions-wise, Persia is the weaker on. At a crossroads of which to form. That's basically an extra idea on top of an already top-tier set of national ideas. Legalism helps with the tech issue and manpower and the schools (-10 % AE or -5 % admin tech cost) stack nicely with Mughals benefits. Then Hindustan, since they get claims on Indochina and A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Here's my situation: Starting as AQ with the idea of forming Mughals (don't know why AQ since it Got the Dharma dlc, and just formed Mughals as soon as i had all my timurids core's and anexed all vassals except Sistan. Which Persia aren't an endgame tag so you can just form Georgia or Mamluks or Delhi or whatever and then you can switch to Mughals.
1mnnn, tthpa, 487ptc, pmfpd, x8s5z, zeo5, isss, gcqgq, jauux, fzqb,
1mnnn, tthpa, 487ptc, pmfpd, x8s5z, zeo5, isss, gcqgq, jauux, fzqb,